No one plays the lottery if there are no winners
Seth Godin
Share story
Seth Godin
Why cities should be building upBesides making cities more affordable and architecturally interesting, tall buildings are greener than sprawl, and they foster social capital and creativity. Yet some urban planners and preservationists seem to have a misplaced fear of heights that yields damaging restrictions on how tall a building can be. From New York to Paris to Mumbai, there’s a powerful case for building up, not out…..
Mumbai’s traffic problems reflect not just poor transportation policy, but a deeper and more fundamental failure of urban planning. In 1991, Mumbai fixed a maximum floor-to-area ratio of 1.33 in most of the city, meaning that it restricted the height of the average building to 1.33 stories: if you have an acre of land, you can construct a two-story building on two-thirds of an acre, or a three-story building on four-ninths of an acre, provided you leave the rest of the property empty. In those years, India still had a lingering enthusiasm for regulation, and limiting building heights seemed to offer a way to limit urban growth.
But Mumbai’s height restrictions meant that, in one of the most densely populated places on Earth, buildings could have an average height of only one and a third stories. People still came; Mumbai’s economic energy drew them in, even when living conditions were awful. Limiting heights didn’t stop urban growth, it just ensured that more and more migrants would squeeze into squalid, illegal slums rather than occupying legal apartment buildings.
Singapore doesn’t prevent the construction of tall buildings, and its downtown functions well because it’s tall and connected. Businesspeople work close to one another and can easily trot to a meeting. Hong Kong is even more vertical and even friendlier to pedestrians, who can walk in air-conditioned skywalks from skyscraper to skyscraper. It takes only a few minutes to get around Wall Street or Midtown Manhattan. Even vast Tokyo can be traversed largely on foot. These great cities function because their height enables a huge number of people to work, and sometimes live, on a tiny sliver of land. But Mumbai is short, so everyone sits in traffic and pays dearly for space. , not out
Share story
Share story
The Migration from Algorithmic to HeuristicIn his excellent book, Drive, Dan Pink distinguishes between algorithmic tasks and heuristictasks.
With an algorithmic task, there is a recipe that you can follow to attain the goal.Employers can continually improve the step-by-step procedures in an algorithmic task, and
following the formula will allow the employee to meet the objective. A checklist can help ensure
that an individual effectively executes an algorithmic task. 4Heuristic tasks have no set steps and require individuals to experiment in order to solve
problems
Examples include setting corporate strategy, developing a new advertising campaign, or coaching
a team. Crafting incentives is inherently more challenging for heuristic tasks because cause and
effect are difficult to link.
Almost all jobs combine algorithmic and heuristic elements and the process of creating value
requires each. But it is important to acknowledge that over the generations the economy has
shifted from a reliance on algorithmic tasks to heuristic tasks.
and you might picture a large steel mill. Such a mill would have lots of employees following
instructions
Devising the procedures and implementing them were both important,
but manpower was disproportionately allocated toward algorithmic tasks.
Today, a research and development lab is a fitting picture of industry. Scientists, for instance,
may be working on developing a drug to cure an illness. If the R&D pays off and the recipe for the
new drug is ready to go, manufacturing the product is relatively straightforward and inexpensive.
Again, algorithmic and heuristic tasks each contribute to value creation, but the emphasis is on
the heuristic tasks.
Research by McKinsey, a consulting firm, shows that over 40 percent of employees in the U.S.
today have jobs based primarily on heuristic tasks, and that 70 percent of the new jobs in recent
years are heuristic. Further, the average wage for an employee doing heuristic tasks is one and
one-half times the wage of a worker dedicated to algorithmic tasks.
heuristic activities appear to be the main drivers of value creation. 5 Imagine industry a century ago—transporting ore, feeding furnaces, shaping steel—and only a handful working on crafting new instructions. 6 Employees engaged in7Here’s the problem in a nutshell: our mix of jobs has changed profoundly while our approach to
incentives has not. As a consequence, we have employees who have lost motivation and faulty
incentive programs that have introduced a raft of unintended consequences.
From, Blaming the Rat, Michael J. Mauboussin
PS if someone tell's you what and how to do it probably it's going to be a low paying job.. Tasks in environments that are evolving and that require novelty are heuristic.
Share story
Think twice
Set your heart on an MBA? Philip Delves Broughton suggests a radical alternative: don’t bother
The problem is that these days it doesn’t work like that. Rather, more and more students are finding the promise of business schools to be hollow. The return on investment on an MBA has gone the way of Greek public debt. If you have a decent job in your mid- to late- 20s, unless you have the backing of a corporate sponsor, leaving it to get an MBA is a higher risk than ever.
PS I think i have made my point.
So what you could do to get ahead.
1.Be different, learn Madarin
2.Be good at a team sport
3.read a lot, everything
4.be specialist in something. Dig deeper in something that no one knows as you do
5.do yoga
6.eat a little (i can't do this one)
7.don't watch TV
8.just be nice if you can
9.Figure out how to mutiply the money you save. Don't do only deposits. Learn how to put the money to work for you.
10.Learn a trick with cards or something else. Make sure you can do something no one can. http://www.economist.com/whichmba/think-twice
Share story
College a waste of time and money for kids, FTHere is what's wrong with college.
First, and foremost, it's too expensive. To send a kid to college you need from $200,000 to $400,000. That's insane. There's no way the incremental advantage they get from having a diploma will ever pay back that amount. Perhaps for the first time the opportunity cost (a phrase I remember from Economics 101) of college does not equal the extra profits generated by the degree.
Second, I don't believe in a balanced education. Most colleges require students to take a smattering of art, maths, sciences and so forth. Taking 10 courses a year on wildly different topics, with enormous homework responsibilities, not to mention droning, boring professors for at least eight of the 10, is the surest formula for creating complete non-interest and inability to remember anything in any of the topics covered. What a waste of $400,000.
And third, there are far better uses of time. One reader asked what her kid should be doing instead of college. Here are some of my responses:
1. Working - not just a labour or service job, but there are internet-content jobs out there. I have high school and college kids working for me who are making over $50,000 a year from writing gigs on the internet. Scour Craigslist for opportunities, your favourite blogs, or websites related to your favourite interests. Companies are dying for good content. Create your own blog, get yourself noticed, build relationships with other content companies and communities.
2. Take half the fee for one semester, give it to your kid, and tell him or her to start a business. Not every youngster has entrepreneurial sensibilities, but it's always worth trying once. The cost for starting a business is next to zero, so it's a viable alternative. What business should they start? For one thing, now that Facebook and MySpace have open development platforms, try out a few applications for these platforms; for a few hundred dollars you can outsource development of these applications to India, and get your friends to start trying them. Make sure they are viral (that is, a message should appear "click here to get all your friends to try XYZ") and see which ones are a success. I mention Facebook and MySpace because every kid is familiar with these sites and comfortable with the subtleties, and it's this comfort that can create the best businesses.
3. Spend a year trying to become good at one thing. Whatever your child's greatest interest is, whether cooking, chess, writing, maths, there are so many resources on the internet available for learning that college is almost the last place a kid should go to pursue a passion. Intense immersion in a favourite topic is the surest way to become an expert in that field.
Share story
Subscrever:
Mensagens (Atom)
Ahmeaaaaaaaaaaaaad Ebraheem
Web Developer
Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident.
Popular Posts
Advertising
Mensagens populares
-
Nec major in laude nec minor in vituperio Saint Augustine
-
From the FT Big read, The slowdown is just one sign of the anxiety among UK residents with non-domicile tax status . The changes were set in...
-
From FT The world faces years of sluggish growth unless leading economies undertake difficult economic reforms, the International Monetary ...
-
The Swiss will vote next Sunday about a check every month to every soul ? why? People are realizing that in the automated world you only n...
-
This picture was taken in Hippikos where i spend the best Holidays with my two boys. Good food, riding 3 different horses a day, and an amaz... -
Erick Eschker, an economist at Humboldt State University, reckons that each American born in 1945 can expect nearly $2.2m in lifetime net t...
-
A grande diferença entre o inteligente e o estúpido - entre o chamado inteligente e o chamado estúpido - é que o primeiro se esforça Agostin...
-
From The Economist, Posing for power Can anything be done about this predisposition for promoting people of a certain type? Ideally, those s...
0 comentários: